Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Herrera v. State

Herrera v. State

141 So. 3d 713, 2014 WL 2957399, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10116
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Herrera v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18048 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 2, 2014·No. No. 4D13-4723·Published

Opinion

[714]*714 On Concession of Error

PER CURIAM.

The State concedes that appellant’s amended postconviction motion, which she filed following our decision in Herrera v. State, 126 So.3d 445 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013), should not have been denied as untimely. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

STEVENSON, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herrera v. State, 141 So. 3d 713, 2014 WL 2957399, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10116 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

141 So. 3d 713 (Herrera v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herrera v. State
126 So. 3d 445 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)