Herrera v. State

25 So. 3d 646, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 22, 2010 WL 22691
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Herrera v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10562
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 6, 2010·No. 4D08-2499·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence, concluding that the trial court did not err in denying appellant’s motion to withdraw his plea. Appellant also argues that the court erred in denying his motion to mitigate sentence as untimely. While we affirm, our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant moving to mitigate within sixty days of the mandate, as provided in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c).

GROSS, C.J., WARNER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herrera v. State, 25 So. 3d 646, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 22, 2010 WL 22691 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

25 So. 3d 646 (Herrera v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.