Herrera v. State

16 So. 3d 902, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10356, 2009 WL 2243860
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 2009·No. 3D09-1459·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Andres A. Herrera appeals an order summarily denying his motion under Flori[903] da Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the post-conviction record, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the post-conviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herrera v. State, 16 So. 3d 902, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10356, 2009 WL 2243860 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

16 So. 3d 902 (Herrera v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fraser v. State
602 So. 2d 1299 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
State v. Cregan
908 So. 2d 387 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Young v. State
697 So. 2d 75 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)