Henderson v. State

838 So. 2d 660, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2407, 2003 WL 554503
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 789 So. 2d 1016
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 28, 2003·No. No. 5D02-3441·Published

Opinion

SHARP, W., J.

Henderson seeks a belated appeal from the trial court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. He claims he submitted a timely notice of appeal and after inquiring as to its status has not received a response. We deny the petition because the allegations contained therein do not show that the time is ripe for seeking a belated appeal.

Henderson alleged he submitted his notice of appeal in a timely manner but has received no response. He must first obtain notification from the circuit court that no notice of appeal was received; he cannot presume his notice of appeal was not delivered. Until the status of his appeal is established, his request for a belated appeal is premature.

[661]*661Petition for Belated Appeal DENIED Without Prejudice to Refile Based on Response of Circuit Court.

ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. State, 838 So. 2d 660, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2407, 2003 WL 554503 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

838 So. 2d 660 (Henderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.