Henderson v. State

758 So. 2d 713, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3717, 2000 WL 313590
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 720 So. 2d 1121
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 29, 2000·No. No. 3D99-1381·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Oneil Henderson appeals an order dated April 23, 1999, which denied his motion for postconviction relief. We agree with the State that the defendant’s earlier sentences in Dade County circuit court case numbers 89-43031, 89-43757, and 89-49366 were probationary split sentences, see Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161, 164 (Fla.1988), and that upon revocation of appellant’s probation, the trial court was authorized to impose a sentence up to the legal maximum. We reject appellant’s incorrect argument that his sentences in these cases were true split sentences. See id.

The State concedes, however, that the thirty-five-year sentences imposed upon revocation of probation exceed the legal maximum of thirty years for these first degree felonies. Accordingly, we reverse the order denying postconviction relief and remand with directions to reduce the sentences to the legal maximum of thirty years. Defendant need not be present.

We reject the appellant’s remaining claims for relief.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions to reduce these sentences to the legal maximum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. State, 758 So. 2d 713, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3717, 2000 WL 313590 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

758 So. 2d 713 (Henderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Poore v. State
531 So. 2d 161 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)