Henderson v. State

753 So. 2d 659, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2240, 2000 WL 257139
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 720 So. 2d 1121
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 8, 2000·No. No. 4D99-0823·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted and sentenced, following a bench trial, for attempted first-degree murder and burglary with a battery. We affirm, but remand to strike a written reference in the judgment that indicates conviction for armed burglary. The judgment and sentence are to be amended to reflect the oral pronouncement of the court convicting Appellant of burglary with a battery, rather than armed burglary. See Landis v. Lewis, 118 Fla. 910, 160 So.485 (Fla.1935); E.S.E. v. State, 627 So.2d 626 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Samudio v. State, 460 So.2d 418 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). After due consideration, we reject as without merit Appellant’s claim that the record reflects an acquittal on the attempted premeditated first-degree murder charge and a conviction for the non-existent crime of attempted first-degree felony murder, which was not charged.

DELL, STONE, and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. State, 753 So. 2d 659, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2240, 2000 WL 257139 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

753 So. 2d 659 (Henderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Samudio v. State
460 So. 2d 418 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
State Ex Rel. Landis v. Lewis
160 So. 485 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
E.S.E. v. State
627 So. 2d 626 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)