E.S.E. v. State

627 So. 2d 626, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12633, 1993 WL 535985
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 23, 1993
DocketNo. 93-364
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 627 So. 2d 626 (E.S.E. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
E.S.E. v. State, 627 So. 2d 626, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12633, 1993 WL 535985 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

This appeal involves a written adjudication of guilt of resisting a police officer without violence. As the state concedes, that adjudication is in conflict with the trial court’s oral pronouncement of guilt of the offense of attempting to resist an officer without violence and the oral pronouncement should control.

Accordingly, the “Order At Trial” and commitment order are reversed and remanded with instructions to conform the written adjudication and commitment order to the oral pronouncement. See Wilkins v. State, 543 So.2d 800 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 554 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1989).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henderson v. State
753 So. 2d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
627 So. 2d 626, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12633, 1993 WL 535985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ese-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.