Henderson v. State

779 So. 2d 329, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16257, 1999 WL 1111760
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 720 So. 2d 1121
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 1999·No. No. 99-00786·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without discussion Bobby Henderson’s conviction for robbery with a firearm and burglary while armed. It is apparent from the face of the record, however, that an incorrectly prepared score-sheet was used to sentence Mr. Henderson. This scoresheet classified Mr. Henderson’s robbery with a firearm charge as a level 10 offense when in actuality it was a level 9 offense. We are unable to say that the trial court would have imposed the same sentence had the score-sheet been properly prepared. Thus, we reverse Mr. Henderson’s sentences and remand for resentencing with a corrected scoresheet. See Mohn v. State, 723 So.2d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Carter v. State, 705 So.2d 582 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Gregory v. State, 666 So.2d 222 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Reversed and remanded.

PATTERSON, C.J., and ALTENBERND and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. State, 779 So. 2d 329, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16257, 1999 WL 1111760 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

779 So. 2d 329 (Henderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gregory v. State
666 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Mohn v. State
723 So. 2d 873 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Carter v. State
705 So. 2d 582 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)