Henderson v. State

793 So. 2d 985, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1040, 2001 WL 98562
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 7, 2001
DocketNo. 2D00-2527
StatusPublished

This text of 793 So. 2d 985 (Henderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henderson v. State, 793 So. 2d 985, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1040, 2001 WL 98562 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order denying Reginald Henderson, Sr.’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) is affirmed without prejudice to Henderson’s filing of a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion pursuant to Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc).

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and BLUE and CASANUEVA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murphy v. State
773 So. 2d 1174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
793 So. 2d 985, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1040, 2001 WL 98562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.