Henderson v. State

770 So. 2d 1260, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14646, 2000 WL 1671437
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 720 So. 2d 1121
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 8, 2000·No. No. 4D00-1696·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellee’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our previous opinion, and substitute the following.

Having determined that the trial court considered the merits of all claims presented by appellant on his Heggs challenge and resentenced appellant in accordance with the 1994 guidelines, we affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s supplemental motion to correct illegal sentence.

AFFIRMED.

DELL, GUNTHER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. State, 770 So. 2d 1260, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14646, 2000 WL 1671437 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

770 So. 2d 1260 (Henderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.