Harris v. State

905 So. 2d 943, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9490, 2005 WL 1420894
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 879 So. 2d 1223
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 20, 2005·No. No. 1D05-0974·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s responses to this Court’s order dated March 21, 2005, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The Order denying the appellant’s “Motion to Amend [Motion for Rehearing] and Second Motion to Amend,” entered on January 31, 2005, is nonappealable. Because the motion for rehearing is not subject to appellate review, this Court is without appellate jurisdiction. [944]*944See Carter v. State, 242 So.2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); Fla. R.App.9.110(b).

DISMISSED.

WOLF, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 905 So. 2d 943, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9490, 2005 WL 1420894 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

905 So. 2d 943 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carter v. State
242 So. 2d 737 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)