Harris v. State
834 So. 2d 908, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 98, 2003 WL 57017
This text of 834 So. 2d 908 (Harris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harris v. State, 834 So. 2d 908, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 98, 2003 WL 57017 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
Opinion
Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant filing a facially sufficient motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 that satisfies the requirements of State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998) and Thomas v. State, 712 So.2d 848 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). See Andujar v. State, 808 So.2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Thomas v. State
712 So. 2d 848 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Andujar v. State
808 So. 2d 271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
834 So. 2d 908, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 98, 2003 WL 57017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.