Harris v. State
834 So. 2d 908, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 98, 2003 WL 57017
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 761 So. 2d 1186 →
Opinion
Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant filing a facially sufficient motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 that satisfies the requirements of State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998) and Thomas v. State, 712 So.2d 848 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). See Andujar v. State, 808 So.2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 834 So. 2d 908, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 98, 2003 WL 57017 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
834 So. 2d 908 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Thomas v. State
712 So. 2d 848 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Andujar v. State
808 So. 2d 271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)