Thomas v. State
This text of 707 So. 2d 1189 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Hugh THOMAS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Hugh Thomas, pro se.
Robert Butterworth, Attorney General; and Trisha E. Meggs, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals an order denying his motion for correction of sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse the order because, although referring to the record of the proceedings, the trial court failed to attach the pertinent information upon which it relied to deny the motion and without such attachments, we are precluded from conducting meaningful review. See Corp v. State, 698 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand either for attachment of those portions of the record that conclusively show that appellant is not entitled to relief, or for further proceedings.
REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
MICKLE and DAVIS, JJ., and McDONALD, PARKER L., Senior Judge, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
707 So. 2d 1189, 1998 WL 142834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.