Harley v. State
This text of 984 So. 2d 586 (Harley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Damion HARLEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Edward T. Bauer of Brooks, LeBoeuf, Bennett, Foster & Gwartney, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Joshua R. Heller, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
*587 PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment and sentence. We note that the appellant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are cognizable on appeal. It is apparent on the face of the record that defense counsel failed to object to certain comments made by the prosecutor during her rebuttal closing argument. We find, however, no merit to these claims. The appellant has not demonstrated that, but for defense counsel's deficient performance, the results of the proceeding would have been different.
AFFIRMED.
BENTON, HAWKES, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
984 So. 2d 586, 2008 WL 2276288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harley-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.