Harris v. State

764 So. 2d 909, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10294, 2000 WL 1140221
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9305
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 14, 2000·No. No. 1D00-435·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from an order summarily denying Appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules ' of Criminal Procedure. The trial court’s order specifically references portions of the record as support for rejecting Appellant’s 14 claims on the merits. However, the trial court failed to attach any excerpts from the record to its order. We reverse the order summarily denying relief and remand for the trial court to attach portions of the record conclusively refuting Appellant’s claims or to conduct an evidentiary hearing. See Byrd v. State, 695 So.2d 1310 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (citing Hall v. State, 603 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Wells v. State, 598 So.2d 259 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); and Oehling v. State, 659 So.2d 1226 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)).

REVERSED.

BOOTH, MINER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 764 So. 2d 909, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10294, 2000 WL 1140221 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

764 So. 2d 909 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wells v. State
598 So. 2d 259 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Hall v. State
603 So. 2d 650 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Oehling v. State
659 So. 2d 1226 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Byrd v. State
695 So. 2d 1310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)