Harris v. State

821 So. 2d 1249, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10808, 2002 WL 1758274
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 761 So. 2d 1186
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 31, 2002·No. No. 1D01-0715·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Marcus Harris, appellant, challenges the trial court’s order revoking his community control and probation, claiming that the state has not proven that his failure to report was willful and substantial. Because there is no record evidence to support the trial court’s finding that this violation was willful and substantial, we reverse and remand for the trial court to vacate appellant’s sentences and reinstate community control and probation. See Blue v. State, 744 So.2d 543 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Robinson v. State, 744 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.

DAVIS and LEWIS, JJ., concur; PADOVANO, J., dissents with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 821 So. 2d 1249, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10808, 2002 WL 1758274 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

821 So. 2d 1249 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. State
744 So. 2d 1188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Blue v. State
744 So. 2d 543 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)