Harris v. State

829 So. 2d 328, 2002 WL 31422649
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 30, 2002·No. 3D01-3073·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

829 So.2d 328 (2002)

Robert HARRIS, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D01-3073.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

October 30, 2002.

Robert Harris, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and RAMIREZ, J., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.

*329 PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of Robert Harris' petition as untimely filed. Even though Harris labeled his petition as one for writ of error coram nobis, all of his allegations pertain to ineffective assistance of counsel in connection with pleas entered on December 8, 1980, and March 21, 1987. The proper pleading which Harris should have filed was a motion under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The trial court, therefore, properly denied the petition as untimely. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 829 So. 2d 328, 2002 WL 31422649 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

829 So. 2d 328 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Medina v. State
919 So. 2d 566 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Howarth v. State
843 So. 2d 351 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)