Harris v. State
886 So. 2d 258, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15674, 2004 WL 2375608
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 818 So. 2d 567 →
Opinion
We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The motion for modification of sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), is addressed to the discretion of the trial court. Therefore, this Court has no jurisdiction to review the correctness of the trial court’s disposition of the motion. Daniels v. State, 568 So.2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
In light of the above, this Court’s order issued on September 14, 2004, is withdrawn, and both of the appellant’s motions for extension of time are denied as moot.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 886 So. 2d 258, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15674, 2004 WL 2375608 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
886 So. 2d 258 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Daniels v. State
568 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)