Harris v. State

816 So. 2d 245, 2001 WL 1867203
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 15, 2002·No. No. 3D01-678·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The conviction and sentence is affirmed in all respects. See Reyes v. State, 700 So.2d 458 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Miller v. State, 430 So.2d 611 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). However, since the defendant objected to the restitution amount, the case must be remanded for a restitution hearing. See Strickland v. State, 746 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Affirmed and remanded for a restitution hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 816 So. 2d 245, 2001 WL 1867203 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

816 So. 2d 245 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

GARDINO MARTINEZ MESA v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2023