Harris v. State
734 So. 2d 1204, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9082, 1999 WL 454454
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 687 So. 2d 29 →
Opinion
We affirm as the arguments made on appeal were not preserved. See Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985). However, even if we were to consider his motion to suppress as raising the argument that he was illegally detained, thus tainting the subsequent search of his vehicle, we find it to be without merit. See Boydell v. State, 690 So.2d 745, 745 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 734 So. 2d 1204, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9082, 1999 WL 454454 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
734 So. 2d 1204 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tillman v. State
471 So. 2d 32 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Boydell v. State
690 So. 2d 745 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)