Harris v. State

679 So. 2d 1320, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10368, 1996 WL 557640
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 647 So. 2d 206
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 2, 1996·No. No. 94-2776·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Harris’ convictions but reverse and remand his sentence for resentencing on the authority of Bardwell v. State, 617 So.2d 431 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). “While the defendant can knowingly waive the requirement of a P.S.I., ... the record in this ease does not reveal such a waiver.” Id. (citation omitted). All other points raised by Harris are not meritorious.

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 679 So. 2d 1320, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10368, 1996 WL 557640 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

679 So. 2d 1320 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bardwell v. State
617 So. 2d 431 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)