Harris v. State
625 So. 2d 1333, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11394, 1993 WL 458966
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 574 So. 2d 243 →
Opinion
In light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, as established by eyewitness and fingerprint identification, any error in the admission of evidence showing the defendant to be the purchaser of bomb parts was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).
The convictions and sentences for attempted first-degree murder, first-degree arson, and discharging a destructive device are AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 625 So. 2d 1333, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11394, 1993 WL 458966 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
625 So. 2d 1333 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. DiGuilio
491 So. 2d 1129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)