Harris v. State
632 So. 2d 711, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1831, 1994 WL 63302
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 580 So. 2d 243 →
Opinion
W. SHARP, Judge.
Because the total amount of restitution ($597.58) in the written order cannot be reconciled with the sum of $507.58, urged by the prosecutor at the restitution hearing (which was miscalculated)1 and $522.58 appears to be the correct amount (based on our humble [712]*712appellate mathematics — no calculators) we remand this cause for a determination of the proper amount. See Luna v. State, 627 So.2d 625 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Marchand v. State, 546 So.2d 1184 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).
Restitution Order QUASHED; REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 632 So. 2d 711, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1831, 1994 WL 63302 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
632 So. 2d 711 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Marchand v. State
546 So. 2d 1184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Luna v. State
627 So. 2d 625 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)