Luna v. State
This text of 627 So. 2d 625 (Luna v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant’s convictions for battery on a law enforcement officer and resisting arrest without violence are affirmed. However, because the State fails to concede the correctness of the sentencing transcript, appellant’s sentences are reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court to resolve the apparent conflict between the written sentencing order and oral pronouncement of those sentences in open court. See Lester v. State, 563 So.2d 178 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
627 So. 2d 625, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12625, 1993 WL 535983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luna-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.