Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Harris v. State

Harris v. State

632 So. 2d 711, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1831, 1994 WL 63302
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 4, 1994
DocketNo. 93-760
StatusPublished

This text of 632 So. 2d 711 (Harris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. State, 632 So. 2d 711, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1831, 1994 WL 63302 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

W. SHARP, Judge.

Because the total amount of restitution ($597.58) in the written order cannot be reconciled with the sum of $507.58, urged by the prosecutor at the restitution hearing (which was miscalculated)1 and $522.58 appears to be the correct amount (based on our humble [712]*712appellate mathematics — no calculators) we remand this cause for a determination of the proper amount. See Luna v. State, 627 So.2d 625 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Marchand v. State, 546 So.2d 1184 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

Restitution Order QUASHED; REMANDED.

GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marchand v. State
546 So. 2d 1184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Luna v. State
627 So. 2d 625 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
632 So. 2d 711, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1831, 1994 WL 63302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.