Blake v. State
61 So. 3d 1269, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7736, 2011 WL 2091136
Opinion
Upon the State’s proper concession of error, we reverse the revocation of Appellant’s probation and resulting sentence. The State presented insufficient evidence below that Appellant committed the new law violation of resisting an officer without violence. See Harris v. State, 647 So.2d 206, 208 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Accordingly, we REVERSE the revocation of Appellant’s probation and REMAND for reinstatement of probation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blake v. State, 61 So. 3d 1269, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7736, 2011 WL 2091136 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
61 So. 3d 1269 (Blake v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harris v. State
647 So. 2d 206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)