In the Interest of C.C.S. v. State

729 So. 2d 1016, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5313, 1999 WL 242435
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 27, 1999
DocketNo. 98-3468
StatusPublished

This text of 729 So. 2d 1016 (In the Interest of C.C.S. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Interest of C.C.S. v. State, 729 So. 2d 1016, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5313, 1999 WL 242435 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. See G.E.G. v. State, 417 So.2d 975, 977 (Fla.1982) (“[W]e hold that when a defendant is charged with possession of a controlled substance, that substance, if available, must be introduced into evidence” where a defendant objects to its nonintroduction.); Harris v. State, 647 So.2d 206, 208 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (holding that a defendant’s mere proximity to a small or trace amount of a controlled substance is not sufficient to establish constructive possession by one of several occupants of a car).

MINER, BENTON, and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris v. State
647 So. 2d 206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
729 So. 2d 1016, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5313, 1999 WL 242435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-ccs-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.