Harris v. State

678 So. 2d 527, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9118, 1996 WL 492179
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 647 So. 2d 206
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 30, 1996·No. Nos. 96-1785, 96-2133·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these two cases, we grant the defendant, James C. Harris’, motion to consolidate. We affirm the trial court’s order denying his 3.850 motion, and we deny the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See Medina v. State, 573 So.2d 293, 295 (Fla.1990); Ferguson v. Singletary, 632 So.2d 53, 57-58 (Fla.1993). The motions to sup[528]*528plement the record are moot and also denied.

COBB, W. SHARP and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 678 So. 2d 527, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9118, 1996 WL 492179 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

678 So. 2d 527 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ferguson v. Singletary
632 So. 2d 53 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Medina v. State
573 So. 2d 293 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)