Harris v. State
773 So. 2d 68, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9054, 1997 WL 441257
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 650 So. 2d 639 →
Opinion
CONFESSION OF ERROR
As the state appropriately concedes, the appellant’s conviction for direct criminal contempt because of an improper remark he allegedly made to the trial judge must be reversed because of the court’s failure to adhere to the provisions of Florida Rule [69]*69of Criminal Procedure 3.830. Accord Patz v. State, 691 So.2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 773 So. 2d 68, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9054, 1997 WL 441257 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
773 So. 2d 68 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Patz v. State
691 So. 2d 66 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)