Harris v. State

644 So. 2d 345, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10591, 1994 WL 594731
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 589 So. 2d 1006
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 2, 1994·No. No. 94-02760·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James C. Harris, Jr. challenges the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The trial court denied Harris’s motion on the basis it was successive and that claims raised therein had already-been disposed of by a previous trial court order. Since, however, the trial court failed to attach the documents upon which its order of denial relied, we remand for attachment of those documents — which, of course, must conclusively refute Harris’s claims — or for further proceedings.

Accordingly, the instant cause is remanded with directions consistent with this opinion.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 644 So. 2d 345, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10591, 1994 WL 594731 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

644 So. 2d 345 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.