Harris v. State
813 So. 2d 254, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4619, 2002 WL 530197
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 2002·No. No. 4D01-982·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In this appeal from a summary denial of a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty, the record demonstrates that the motion was filed more than thirty days after the imposition of sentence. Moreover the motion itself was legally insufficient; no factual basis is alleged for movant’s newly and conclusorily professed failure to understand the plea agreement. We therefore affirm but our decision is without prejudice to any timely filed motion under rule 3.850.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 813 So. 2d 254, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4619, 2002 WL 530197 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
813 So. 2d 254 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Winfield v. State
834 So. 2d 335 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)