Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Winfield v. State

Winfield v. State

834 So. 2d 335, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 43, 2003 WL 19941
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 3, 2003
DocketNo. 5D02-2833
StatusPublished

This text of 834 So. 2d 335 (Winfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winfield v. State, 834 So. 2d 335, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 43, 2003 WL 19941 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s denial of grounds one, three, and five is affirmed. The court’s denial of grounds two and four which allege ineffective assistance of counsel is affirmed without prejudice to defendant’s right to file a timely, legally sufficient Rule 3.850 motion on or before February 2, 2003, directed to those two grounds. See Burns v. State, 651 So.2d 813 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Harris v. State, 813 So.2d 254 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, PLEUS, JJ., and COBB, W., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burns v. State
651 So. 2d 813 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Harris v. State
813 So. 2d 254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
834 So. 2d 335, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 43, 2003 WL 19941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winfield-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.