Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Harris v. State

Harris v. State

787 So. 2d 62, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2104, 2001 WL 193840
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 28, 2001
DocketNo. 2D00-4433
StatusPublished

This text of 787 So. 2d 62 (Harris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. State, 787 So. 2d 62, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2104, 2001 WL 193840 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order denying Buster Harris’ motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) is affirmed without prejudice to Harris’ right, if any, to file a rule 3.850 motion as to his one guidelines sentence. See Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc) (affirming without prejudice to filing a rule 3.850 motion challenging the voluntariness of the plea based upon a plea agreement wherein petitioner received the bottom of the 1995 guidelines).

Affirmed.

GREEN, A.C.J., and DAVIS, J., and CAMPBELL, MONTEREY, (Senior) Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murphy v. State
773 So. 2d 1174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
787 So. 2d 62, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2104, 2001 WL 193840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.