Home/Supreme Court/Haig v. Bissonette

Haig v. Bissonette

485 U.S. 264, 108 S. Ct. 1253, 99 L. Ed. 2d 288, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 1317
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 21, 1988
Docket86-987
StatusPublished
Cited by28 cases

This text of 485 U.S. 264 (Haig v. Bissonette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haig v. Bissonette, 485 U.S. 264, 108 S. Ct. 1253, 99 L. Ed. 2d 288, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 1317 (1988).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Because the Court lacks a quorum, 28 U. S. C. § 1, and since a majority of the qualified Justices are of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next Term of the Court, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is affirmed under 28 U. S. C. § 2109, which provides that under these circumstances the Court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided Court.

The Chief Justice, Justice O’Connor, Justice Scalia, and Justice Kennedy took no part in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Military Support for Customs and Border Protection Along the Southern Border Under the Posse Comitatus Act
Office of Legal Counsel, 2021
Wong v. Minnesota Department of Human Services
820 F.3d 922 (Eighth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Michael Dreyer
804 F.3d 1266 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF—APPELLEE v. FRITZ ARLO LOOKING CLOUD, DEFENDANT—APPELLANT
419 F.3d 781 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Looking Cloud
Eighth Circuit, 2005
United States v. Andrew Anthony Belcher, United States of America v. Garfield Anthony Walters
288 F.3d 1068 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Andrew A. Belcher
Eighth Circuit, 2002
Brown v. Ely
14 P.3d 257 (Alaska Supreme Court, 2000)
Wullschleger v. Peters
28 F. Supp. 2d 549 (D. Nebraska, 1998)
Riley v. Newton
94 F.3d 632 (Eleventh Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Mohamed Basher Al-Talib, United States of America v. Hector Rivera Munoz
55 F.3d 923 (Fourth Circuit, 1995)
Richard Eugene Abbott v. City of Crocker, Missouri James Stone
30 F.3d 994 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Terry Lee Kummer
15 F.3d 1455 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)
Kim v. State
817 P.2d 467 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1991)
Wade v. Blasingame
931 F.2d 1285 (Eighth Circuit, 1991)
Rodriguez v. City of Passaic
730 F. Supp. 1314 (D. New Jersey, 1990)
Mitchell v. City of Sapulpa
857 F.2d 713 (Tenth Circuit, 1988)
Robert B. Davis v. David Little, Individually and in His Capacity as an Officer in the Police Department of Waterbury, Connecticut
851 F.2d 605 (Second Circuit, 1988)
Haig v. Bissonette
486 U.S. 1019 (Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
485 U.S. 264, 108 S. Ct. 1253, 99 L. Ed. 2d 288, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 1317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haig-v-bissonette-scotus-1988.