Hackin v. Arizona
389 U.S. 143, 88 S. Ct. 325, 19 L. Ed. 2d 347, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 269
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 13, 1967
Docket523
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases
This text of 389 U.S. 143 (Hackin v. Arizona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hackin v. Arizona, 389 U.S. 143, 88 S. Ct. 325, 19 L. Ed. 2d 347, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 269 (1967).
Opinions
The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Upsolve, Inc. v. James
S.D. New York, 2022
State v. Foster
674 So. 2d 747 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
State v. Hunt
880 P.2d 96 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1994)
Ippolito v. State of Fla.
824 F. Supp. 1562 (M.D. Florida, 1993)
Monroe v. Horwitch
820 F. Supp. 682 (D. Connecticut, 1993)
State v. Carroll
817 S.W.2d 289 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1991)
Lawline v. American Bar Ass'n
738 F. Supp. 288 (N.D. Illinois, 1990)
Nordgren v. Hafter
616 F. Supp. 742 (S.D. Mississippi, 1985)
Connor v. Cal-Az Properties, Inc.
668 P.2d 896 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1983)
Gumbhir v. Kansas State Board of Pharmacy
646 P.2d 1078 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1982)
Robert J. Wright v. Lane County District Court, and David Burks
647 F.2d 940 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
Hunt v. Maricopa County Employees Merit System Commission
619 P.2d 1036 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1980)
Application of Hansen
275 N.W.2d 790 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1978)
Hystad v. Rhay
533 P.2d 409 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1975)
Menin v. Menin
79 Misc. 2d 285 (New York Supreme Court, 1974)
Harold A. Spriggs, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Jerry v. Wilson, Chief of Police
467 F.2d 382 (D.C. Circuit, 1972)
Gratton Earl Moore v. United States
432 F.2d 730 (Third Circuit, 1970)
Sanders v. Russell
401 F.2d 241 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)
James E. Sanders v. Honorable Dan M. Russell, Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Joan Anderson v. Honorable William Harold Cox, Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
401 F.2d 241 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)
Sobol v. Perez
289 F. Supp. 392 (E.D. Louisiana, 1968)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
389 U.S. 143, 88 S. Ct. 325, 19 L. Ed. 2d 347, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hackin-v-arizona-scotus-1967.