Griswold v. Connecticut

380 U.S. 939, 85 S. Ct. 1021
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 15, 1965
DocketNo. 496
StatusPublished

This text of 380 U.S. 939 (Griswold v. Connecticut) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Griswold v. Connecticut, 380 U.S. 939, 85 S. Ct. 1021 (1965).

Opinion

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Err. Conn. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 379 U. S. 926.) Motion of Dr. John M. Adams et al. for leave to file brief, as amici curiae, granted. Motion of Catholic Council on Civil Liberties for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Motion of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Motion of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., for leave to participate in oral argument, as amicus curiae, denied. Whitney North Seymour for Adams et al. Alfred L. Scanlan for Catholic Council on Civil Liberties. Morris L. Ernst, Harriet F. Pilpel and Nancy F. Wechsler for Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
380 U.S. 939, 85 S. Ct. 1021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griswold-v-connecticut-scotus-1965.