H. R. Head v. State

96 S.W.2d 981, 131 Tex. Crim. 96, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 437
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 3, 1936
DocketNo. 18409.
StatusPublished
Cited by37 cases

This text of 96 S.W.2d 981 (H. R. Head v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
H. R. Head v. State, 96 S.W.2d 981, 131 Tex. Crim. 96, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 437 (Tex. 1936).

Opinions

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for violation of the provisions of Art. 827a, P. C., regulating the operation of vehicles on highways; penalty assessed at a fine of one dollar.

Section 6 of Art. 827a, P. C., contains the following:

“Any license and weight inspector of the State Highway department, having reason to belive (believe) that the gross weight of a loaded vehicle is unlawful, is authorized to weigh the same either by means of portable or stationary scales, and to require that such vehicle be driven to the nearest scales in the event such scales are within two miles. The inspector may then require the driver or operator to unload immediately such portion of the load as may be necessary to decrease the gross weight of such vehicle to the maximum gross weight specified by this Act.”

See Vernon’s Ann. Tex. P. C., Vol. 2, 1935 Pocket Supplement, p. 60.

The State’s witness Hosmer Hunt, Constable of Precinct No. 5 of Grandview, Johnson County, Texas, testified that while patrolling the highway on the 4th day of January, 1936, he noticed appellant driving a commercial motor vehicle which appeared to be overloaded. He stopped] the appellant and requested him to go back to Grandview and weigh the vehicle which he was driving. This appellant failed to do and was arrested by the constable.

Appellant testified that on the morning of January 4, 1936, he was stopped on Highway No. 2, between Grandview and Alvarado, Texas, by the witness Hunt, who told him to return to Grandview and weigh his truck, which the constable thought was overloaded. Appellant said he was in a hurry and refused to weigh his truck because he did not think it was overloaded. He also testified that he did not think he was violating the law in refusing to stop and weigh his truck when requested to do so by a constable.

The State’s Attorney before this court concedes that the statute in question (Sec. 6 of Art. 827a) confers authority only upon License and Weight Inspectors of the State Highway' Department to require drivers and operators of motor vehicles to have their trucks and contents weighed; and that constables and other peace officers of the state are without such authority. In this view we are inclined to concur.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jeffrey Ray Porter v. the State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2024
Jacob Wilson, III v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2018
McClenty, Charles Jerome
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Marshall, Juanito v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013
Chapa v. Traciers & Associates
267 S.W.3d 386 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
Jose Acevedo v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008
Miles v. State
241 S.W.3d 28 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)
Miles, Lawrence Preston
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007
Coggin v. State
123 S.W.3d 82 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Robert Lee Coggin v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003
El Pueblo De Puerto Rico v. Moraima Rodriguez Lugo
2002 TSPR 3 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 2002)
Pueblo v. Rodríguez Lugo
156 P.R. Dec. 42 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 2002)
Andrade v. State
6 S.W.3d 584 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Dunn v. State
979 S.W.2d 403 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Turner v. State
901 S.W.2d 767 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Crowley v. State
842 S.W.2d 701 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 S.W.2d 981, 131 Tex. Crim. 96, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/h-r-head-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.