Gumpert v. State
This text of 228 S.W. 238 (Gumpert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant is convicted of passing a forged instrument, and punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
The case was tried upon a plea of guilty. Evidence was heard, and, as embodied in the statement of facts, is sufficient to support the judgment of guilt.
The indictment was attacked by a motion to quash and motion in arrest of judgment. The questions presented are-in substance the same as those reviewed in the case of the same appellant — No. 6125, 228 S. W. 237. We therein held that the records revealed no error committed by the trial court.' Of this record we express the same opinion.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 S.W. 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gumpert-v-state-texcrimapp-1921.