Gumpert v. State

229 S.W. 330, 89 Tex. Crim. 64

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gumpert v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 88 Tex. Crim. 492 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 16, 1921·No. No. 6164·Published

Opinion

MORROW, P. J.

Appellant is convicted of forgery. The case is a companion to No. 6162, 229 S. W. 329.

Appellant is charged with forging a check purporting to be drawn by C. A. Morris. The indictment complies with the law. There is no statement of facts.

Such bills of exceptions as are found in the record relate to criticisms to the court’s charge, the merits of which could not be passed upon in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, P. J.

Appellant is convicted of forgery. The case is a companion to No. 6162, 229 S. W. 329.

Appellant is charged with forging a check purporting to be drawn by C. A. Morris. The indictment complies with the law. There is no statement of facts.

Such bills of exceptions as are found in the record relate to criticisms to the court’s charge, the merits of which could not be passed upon in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

Gumpert v. State, 229 S.W. 330, 89 Tex. Crim. 64 (Tex. 1921).

Pincite

229 S.W. 330 (Gumpert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Gumpert v. State

229 S.W. 329 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)

Opinion

Related