Gumpert v. State

229 S.W. 323, 89 Tex. Crim. 40, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 345
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gumpert v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 88 Tex. Crim. 492
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 16, 1921·No. No. 6161.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of forgery in the District Court of McLennan County, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the State penitentiary for a term of two years.

The State makes a motion to dismiss this appeal because the record contains no sentence. An inspection of the same shows that the motion is well taken. Said' motion is sustained and the appeal dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gumpert v. State, 229 S.W. 323, 89 Tex. Crim. 40, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 345 (Tex. 1921).

229 S.W. 323 (Gumpert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.