Chowning v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Chowning v. State

127 S.W.2d 466, 137 Tex. Crim. 12, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 63

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 21, 1938

DocketNo. 20056.

StatusPublished

This text of 127 S.W.2d 466 (Chowning v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chowning v. State, 127 S.W.2d 466, 137 Tex. Crim. 12, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 63 (Tex. 1938).

Pincite

Opinions

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Passing a forged instrument is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The evidence presented and the legal questions raised in the instant case are identically the same as those which are before the court in the companion case of Chowning v. State, No. 20,055, in which an opinion affirming the judgment of conviction is this day rendered. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment in the present appeal is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Passing a forged instrument is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The evidence presented and the legal questions raised in the instant case are identically the same as those which are before the court in the companion case of Chowning v. State, No. 20,055, in which an opinion affirming the judgment of conviction is this day rendered. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment in the present appeal is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 S.W.2d 466, 137 Tex. Crim. 12, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chowning-v-state-texcrimapp-1938.