Grimes v. State

134 So. 920, 24 Ala. App. 642
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grimes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ala. App. 378
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 26, 1931·No. 4 Div. 771.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This court en banc has read and considered the evidence in this case, and has reached tbe conclusion that such evidence is not sufficient to justify á verdict of guilt. The court erred to a reversal in holding otherwise. Hackworth v. State, 19 Ala. App. 682, 96 So. 941; Huckabaa v. State, 23 Ala. App. 333, 125 So. 202; McKinnon v. State, 22 Ala. App. 654, 119 So. 596; Clayton v. State, 22 Ala. App. 276, 114 So. 787; Vinson v. State, 22 Ala. App. 112; 113 So. 86; Coggins v. State, 23 Ala. App. 135, 122 So. 186.

Tbe judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

See, also, 23 Ala. App. 511, 128 So. 120.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grimes v. State, 134 So. 920, 24 Ala. App. 642 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

134 So. 920 (Grimes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vinson v. State
113 So. 86 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1927)
Hackworth v. State
96 So. 941 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)
Coggin v. State
122 So. 186 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1929)
McKinnon v. State
119 So. 596 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1929)
Huckabaa v. State
125 So. 202 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1929)
Clayton v. State
114 So. 187 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1927)
Grimes v. State
128 So. 120 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1930)