Grimes v. State
135 So. 595, 24 Ala. App. 364, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 17
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grimes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ala. App. 378 →
Opinion
Violating prohibition law.
“Rum” is a prohibited liquor. Code 1923, § 4615.
There was no error in allowing the state’s witnesses to testify, over appellant’s objection, that the liquid, of which he was admittedly found in possession, was “rum.” Harwell v. State, 12 Ala. App. 265, 68 So. 500, certiorari denied, etc., Id., 192 Ala. 689, 68 So. 1019.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grimes v. State, 135 So. 595, 24 Ala. App. 364, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 17 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).
135 So. 595 (Grimes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harwell v. State
68 So. 500 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)