Grimes v. State
This text of 134 So. 920 (Grimes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This court en banc has read and considered the evidence in this case, and has reached tbe conclusion that such evidence is not sufficient to justify á verdict of guilt. The court erred to a reversal in holding otherwise. Hackworth v. State, 19 Ala. App. 682, 96 So. 941; Huckabaa v. State, 23 Ala. App. 333, 125 So. 202; McKinnon v. State, 22 Ala. App. 654, 119 So. 596; Clayton v. State, 22 Ala. App. 276, 114 So. 787; Vinson v. State, 22 Ala. App. 112; 113 So. 86; Coggins v. State, 23 Ala. App. 135, 122 So. 186.
Tbe judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
See, also, 23 Ala. App. 511, 128 So. 120.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 So. 920, 24 Ala. App. 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grimes-v-state-alactapp-1931.