Hackworth v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hackworth v. State

96 So. 941, 19 Ala. App. 682

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 29, 1923

Docket8 Div. 37.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 So. 941 (Hackworth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hackworth v. State, 96 So. 941, 19 Ala. App. 682 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was indicted in two counts charging manufacturing whisky and possessing a still, an'd from the judgment of conviction he appeals. ' After carefully considering the evidence as shown by the record we are of the opinion that the evidence is not sufficient to justify a verdict of guilt.' The court should have so instructed the jury as requested. For this error the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was indicted in two counts charging manufacturing whisky and possessing a still, an'd from the judgment of conviction he appeals. ' After carefully considering the evidence as shown by the record we are of the opinion that the evidence is not sufficient to justify a verdict of guilt.' The court should have so instructed the jury as requested. For this error the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 So. 941, 19 Ala. App. 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hackworth-v-state-alactapp-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack