Grimes v. State
135 So. 644, 24 Ala. App. 392, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 39
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grimes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ala. App. 378 →
Opinion
The indictment is in Code form, section 4556, form 101, Code 1923, and sufficiently charges a violation of the prohibition statute. Jinright v. State, 220 Ala. 268, 125 So. 606.
The indictment does not seek to charge a violation of the statute aimed at the transportation of liquors in quantities of five gallons or more. Acts 1927, p. 704. The demurrer to the indictment was properly overruled.
We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grimes v. State, 135 So. 644, 24 Ala. App. 392, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 39 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).
135 So. 644 (Grimes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jinright v. State
125 So. 606 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)