Godby v. State

227 S.W. 192, 88 Tex. Crim. 360, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 457
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 24, 1920·No. No. 5967.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in. the District Court of Parker County, of the offense of perjury, and his punishment fixed at six years confinement in the penitentiary.

Our Assistant Attorney-General moves to dismiss this appeal, because of a defective recognizance, and an examination of same discloses that the motion is well taken. The recognizance appearing on page 61 of the transcript does not state the offense for which appellant was convicted nor the punishment assessed and is otherwise not in the form prescribed by our statute and decisions. See Article 903, Vernon’s Code of Criminal Procedure; Watson v. State, 62 Texas Crim. Rep., 620; White v. State, 68 Texas Crim. Rep., 147, 151 S. W. Rep., 826.

The motion of the State is sustained, and the appeal dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Godby v. State, 227 S.W. 192, 88 Tex. Crim. 360, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 457 (Tex. 1920).

227 S.W. 192 (Godby v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eldridge v. State
14 S.W.2d 1036 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Rhea v. State
275 S.W. 1021 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Barnaby v. State
268 S.W. 470 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Reed v. State
267 S.W. 271 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Brown v. State
254 S.W. 995 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Ex Parte Cochrain
243 S.W. 455 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)