Watson v. State
138 S.W. 611, 62 Tex. Crim. 620, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 350
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 21, 1911
DocketNo. 1225.
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases
This text of 138 S.W. 611 (Watson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Watson v. State, 138 S.W. 611, 62 Tex. Crim. 620, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 350 (Tex. 1911).
Opinions
The recognizance is deficient in that it fails to state the amount of the punishment or its character. This omission from the recognizance renders it fatally defective, and requires a dismissal of the appeal. The appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rhea v. State
275 S.W. 1021 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Ex Parte Cochrain
243 S.W. 455 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Godby v. State
227 S.W. 192 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Young v. State
222 S.W. 1103 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Willoughby v. State
219 S.W. 468 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Goss v. State
202 S.W. 956 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1918)
Joseph v. State
204 S.W. 320 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1918)
Stubblefield v. State
200 S.W. 1090 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1918)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
138 S.W. 611, 62 Tex. Crim. 620, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-state-texcrimapp-1911.