Willoughby v. State

219 S.W. 468, 87 Tex. Crim. 40, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 472
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 10, 1919
DocketNo. 5574.
StatusPublished
Cited by32 cases

This text of 219 S.W. 468 (Willoughby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willoughby v. State, 219 S.W. 468, 87 Tex. Crim. 40, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 472 (Tex. 1919).

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary in the District Court of Bowie County, and given two years in the penitentiary.

The Assistant Attorney General has made a motion to dismiss this appeal, because the recognizance of the appellant, as the same appears in the record, does not show the punishment fixed against appellant. The, recognizance is as follows:

“THIS DAY Came into open Court, Chester Willoughby, Defendant, in the above styled and numbered cause, who, together with *42 Frank Davenport and J. A. Davenport, Sureties, acknowledged themselves jointly and severally, indebted to the State of Texas, in the sum of One Thousand ($1000) Dollars, Conditioned that the said Chester Willoughby, who stands charged with the offense of a felony in this Court, and who has been convicted of the offense of a Felony in this Court, shall appear before this Court from day to day, and from Term to Term of same, and not depart therefrom, without leave of this Court, in order to abide a judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of the State of Texas, in this cause.”'

An inspection of the recognizance will show that the ground of the' motion is well taken, ,and the appeal, for that reason, is dismissed. Hays v. State, 83 Texas Crim. Rep., 569, 204 S. W. R., 330; Goss v. State, 83 Texas Crim. Rep., 349, 202 S. W. R., 956; Watson v. State, 62 Texas Crim. Rep., 620.

The motion is sustained and the appeal dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R.L.S., Matter Of
575 S.W.2d 665 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Matter of Rls
575 S.W.2d 665 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Eanes v. State
546 S.W.2d 312 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1977)
Hawkins v. State
505 S.W.2d 578 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Chase v. State
508 S.W.2d 605 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Hurt v. State
480 S.W.2d 747 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Corpus v. State
463 S.W.2d 4 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Patterson v. State
458 S.W.2d 658 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1970)
Holland v. State
415 S.W.2d 186 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Phillips v. State
328 S.W.2d 873 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1959)
Trollinger v. State
219 S.W.2d 1018 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1949)
Taggart v. State
191 S.W.2d 728 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1946)
Mosley v. State
141 S.W.2d 331 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1940)
Yarbrough v. State
123 S.W.2d 356 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Harris v. State
10 S.W.2d 551 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Silver v. State
8 S.W.2d 144 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Dozier v. State
289 S.W. 45 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Hext v. State
282 S.W. 242 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Rhea v. State
275 S.W. 1021 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
McClure v. State
251 S.W. 1099 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 S.W. 468, 87 Tex. Crim. 40, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willoughby-v-state-texcrimapp-1919.